Clik here to view.
“IO Group v. Doe” case has been dismissed
Sperlein voluntarily dismissed “IO Group v. Doe” case with prejudice: View this document on Scribd Even though the defendant lives in Texas, he was initially sued in the Northern District of California...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Updated Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena
A couple of weeks ago I published the Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoena template that this blog’s reader, Sy Ableman, created. Yesterday he emailed an updated version with the following explanation:...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Carlos Somoza: a perfect target for extortion?
A couple of forum pages ago I wrote about the NJ lawyers who were investigated by SEC for security fraud. These lawyers are Sperlein’s proxies suing Carlos Somoza for copyright infringement on behalf...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Why you shouldn’t talk to plaintiff’s lawyer
Embedded is an excellent lecture by a law professor explaining why you should never talk to police. Why am I posting it and how is it related to the topic of this blog? I see a great similarity between...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Why you shouldn’t talk to plaintiff’s lawyer: reader’s comment
Below is the comment to my recent post “Why you shouldn’t talk plaintiff’s lawyer” submitted by a blog’s reader and contributor (DieTrollDie). The cake analogy was so good that I decided to post the...
View ArticleClik here to view.
All but one defendant severed from the case “IO Group v. Does 1-138”
US District Judge Claudia Wilken issued an order regarding the case “IO group v. Does 1-138”. She had severed and dismissed without prejudice all the Does except Doe #10, who had earlier filed a motion...
View ArticleClik here to view.
IO Group v. Does 1-138 case is closed
Last week all the Does except Doe #10 were dismissed from this case. On August 11, 2011, the Court directed Plaintiff to decide whether to name S.P. as a Defendant and that, if it chose to do so, to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Case “IO Group v. Does 1-50 Inclusive” has been voluntarily dismissed
One of few remaining IO Group v. Does cases was voluntarily dismissed this week. Congratulations to those victims who did not succumb to threats. This case was dismissed without prejudice, but today...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is there honor among trolls?
I was reading various mass file-sharing lawsuit complaints recently and found out that they are heavily copied from each other. I was daydreaming how wonderful it could be if copyright trolls would...
View ArticleClik here to view.
No more IO Group v. People cases – the last one is over
The only remaining IO Group’s eDonkey2000 infringement case, IO Group v. Antonio Almeida, was dismissed with prejudice yesterday: View this document on Scribd We will never know if any money changed...
View Article
